Showing posts with label decision-making. Show all posts
Showing posts with label decision-making. Show all posts

Monday, 3 November 2014

JUST PUBLISHED: Decision Making - Monkey See, Monkey Do (But Not Like a Human)

A great deal is known about how we make simple decisions, right down to the way neurons in our brains connect to translate the things we sense into the responses we make. Some of the most important neural studies of decision-making have used monkeys as an analogue for humans. The broader scope of methodology which can be used with primates has provided information far beyond that obtainable from human experimentation. However, conclusions based on animal experiments may not always translate to humans.

Recent work using single cell recordings from monkeys (Bonnet macaques) drew a particularly strong conclusion about human decision making – that all current theories about how decisions are made were wrong, in spite of these theories having decades of support from empirical studies in humans. This conclusion was supported by analysis of how the monkeys responded to instructions to change their decision-making strategy. There was an apparent disconnect between the way the neural recordings from the monkeys’ neurons changed between strategy conditions and the way theories of human decision-making suggested those changes should occur.



In a re-analysis of the monkey data, Peter Cassey, Andrew Heathcote, and Scott Brown came to a different conclusion; the disconnect is not between cognitive and neural accounts of decision making, but between the decision-making strategies employed by humans and those employed by monkeys, even in the same – and very simple! – task. When we allowed both behavioural and neural data to inform our analysis, it was apparent that the monkeys from these experiments were just not making decisions in the same manner as humans.

There is a cautionary tale here - the failure to properly account for inter-species differences, even for processes assumed to be analogous, such as simple perceptual decisions, can lead to incorrect conclusions about the nature of humans. The commonly-used analogy between human and monkeys in simple decision-making appears to break down once strategic choices enter the picture.

For further details, please see the following open-access article:

Cassey, P., Heathcote, A., & Brown, S. (2014). Brain and Behavior in Decision-Making PLoS Computational Biology, 10 (7), 1-7 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003700

Thursday, 27 June 2013

JUST PUBLISHED: Context Effects in Decision-Making - Do You Really Want that Extra Large Popcorn?

For those of you have children who watch the "Brain Games" series on Foxtel you may remember an episode about how our decisions can be manipulated by marketing. They described a scenario where movie goers were offered a small popcorn for $2 or a large one for $7. Everyone chose the cheaper option until a third one was introduced, a medium popcorn for $6.50, which caused people to prefer the large popcorn with comments like "We may as well get it because it is only 50c more".

This is an example of a decision context effect, where the introduction of a third option (which doesn't get chosen) causes a change in preference between the original two options. Our paper shows that this context effect, and two others, occur not only in consumer decisions but also in simple perceptual decisions (about the size of rectangles) and so tell us something fundamental about most, if not all, human decision processes.

This work arose out of a visit to the Newcastle Cognition Laboratory in 2012 by Jennifer Trueblood, a graduate student at Indiana, now faculty at UC Irvine. We presently are revising a paper that has been invited for resubmission at Psychological Review, describing a new theory of these effects, the MLBA model, hopefully something we can describe in more detail in a future post!

-----------------------------------------

For more information, please see the following journal artcile:

Trueblood, J., Brown, S., Heathcote, A., & Busemeyer, J. (2013). Not Just for Consumers: Context Effects Are Fundamental to Decision Making Psychological Science, 24 (6), 901-908 DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464241

or email Andrew.Heathcote@newcastle.edu.au